Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Laura's avatar

I don't agree that it was bad from the start. I think the original cast was very funny and innovative.

Leftists still think they are the rebellious outsiders fighting the establishment even as they are the establishment. The most edgy and rebellious thing to be right now is conservative. Trump and Musk are the rebels.

Koba's avatar

It stopped being really funny at the end of the 90s. My parents had the original cast of Belushi, Ackroyd, Curtin, and Chase; we had Farley, Spade, Sandler, and Rock. They were real comedians who made comedy an art form and we still quote their characters today. By the 2000s SNL lost its mojo and the new casts just didn’t have the staying power and the hilarity; SNL was simply getting boring. Even long term shows have to innovate and understand their audience, sadly SNL has not; likely because Lorne Michaels has been there far too long and the overall trend in late night tv moving to left night tv. You know it is bad for networks when a cable show (Gutfeld) has higher ratings than the crap on network tv. Who actually finds Kimmel, Colbert, or SNL funny? It’s a mixture of left night and the hosts and casts being boring and unfunny; result, ratings bomb. NBC should cancel SNL and put on reruns of Friends or Cheers; far funnier and their ratings would probably go up; no television show is indestructible; as Silvio from the Sopranos once said, “you’re only as good as your last envelope.”

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?